• DocumentCode
    3697312
  • Title

    From microelectromechanical switches to nanoelectromechanical switches: Lessons and differences

  • Author

    Jun-Bo Yoon

  • Author_Institution
    School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
  • fYear
    2015
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    1
  • Abstract
    Since a microelectromechanical (MEM) switch with an electrostatically actuated cantilever was first demonstrated by Petersen in 1978 [1], MEM switches and nanoelectromechanical (NEM) switches have actively been researched so far by many research groups. This is because they are considered as one of the ideal switching devices, thanks to their ideal zero leakage characteristic, nearly infinite sub-threshold slope, large On/Off current ratio, low power consumption, and immunity to harsh environments. Now, we are dreaming of a NEM IC in the future (Fig. 1).
  • Keywords
    "Integrated circuits","Contacts","Electrical engineering","Electronic mail","Switches","Power demand","Transistors"
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Energy Efficient Electronic Systems (E3S), 2015 Fourth Berkeley Symposium on
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/E3S.2015.7336787
  • Filename
    7336787