• DocumentCode
    40857
  • Title

    Reducing Ionospheric Effects in InSAR Data Using Accurate Coregistration

  • Author

    Chen, Albert C. ; Zebker, Howard A.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA
  • Volume
    52
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Jan. 2014
  • Firstpage
    60
  • Lastpage
    70
  • Abstract
    Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a valuable tool for the study of geophysical phenomena such as crustal deformation, ice motion and structure, and vegetation canopy depths, but it is adversely affected by uncharacterized inhomogeneities in ionospheric propagation delay. Ionospheric disturbances distort both InSAR phase and correlation maps. Here, we present a method to compensate ionospheric propagation variations using accurate image coregistration. This significantly improves both the interferometric coherence and phase accuracy. An azimuth gradient in the total electron content (TEC) from a spatially variable ionosphere results in a range-dependent azimuth phase gradient being added to the phase histories of the pixels being imaged. These phase gradients are equivalent to Doppler shifts, and thus they cause azimuth offsets between the actual and imaged positions of the pixels. Measuring these offsets accurately permits estimation of the gradient and correction of the interferograms for much of the phase distortion, resulting in more accurate estimates of coherence. We show an example over Greenland where the TEC variation causes the correlation to drop from about 0.7 to about 0.2 in one region if spatially varying offsets are not accounted for; it also adds an estimated 4.4 radians of interferometric phase over an 80 km InSAR scene. After applying our algorithm, we find that the correlation in regions affected by the ionospheric inhomogeneity becomes comparable to correlation in the rest of the image. In a more challenging example over Iceland, we show that our method improves the correlation from 0.15 to 0.25 in some areas.
  • Keywords
    geophysical image processing; image registration; ionospheric disturbances; ionospheric techniques; radar interferometry; remote sensing by radar; synthetic aperture radar; Doppler shifts; Greenland; Iceland; InSAR correlation maps; InSAR data; InSAR phase; InSAR scene; TEC variation; accurate coregistration; crustal deformation; geophysical phenomena; ice motion; ice structure; image coregistration; interferometric coherence; interferometric synthetic aperture radar; ionospheric disturbances; ionospheric effects; ionospheric propagation delay; phase accuracy; pixel phase histories; total electron content; vegetation canopy depths; Azimuth; Coherence; Correlation; Ice; Instruments; Ionosphere; Synthetic aperture radar; Ionosphere; microwave propagation; radar interferometry; radar remote sensing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2012.2236098
  • Filename
    6428644