DocumentCode
484390
Title
Binary Classification Strategies for Mapping Urban Land Cover with Ensemble Classifiers
Author
Chan, Jonathan Cheung-Wai ; Demarchi, Luca ; Van de Voorde, Tim ; Canters, Frank
Author_Institution
Geogr. Dept., Vrije Univ. Brussel, Brussels
Volume
3
fYear
2008
fDate
7-11 July 2008
Abstract
We investigated two binary classification strategies to further extend the strength of ensemble classifiers for mapping of urban objects. The first strategy was a one-against-one approach. The idea behind it was to employ a pairwise binary classification where n(n-1)/2 classifiers are created, n being the number of classes. Each of the n(n-1)/2 classifiers was trained using only training cases from two classes at a time. The ensemble was then combined by majority voting. The second strategy was a one-against-all binary approach: if there are n classes, with a = {1,..., n} being one of the classes, then n classifiers were generated, each representing a binary classification of a and non-a. The ensemble was combined using accuracy estimates obtained for each class. Both binary strategies were applied on two single classifiers (decision trees and artificial neural network) and two ensemble classifiers (Random Forest and Adaboost). Two multi-source data sets were used: one was prepared for an object-based classification and one for a conventional pixel-based approach. Our results indicate that ensemble classifiers generate significantly higher accuracies than a single classifier. Compared to a single C5.0 tree, Random Forest and Adaboost increased the accuracy by 2 to 12%. The range of increase depends on the data set that was used. Applying binary classification strategies often increases accuracy, but only marginally (between 1-3%). All increases are statistically significant, except on one occasion. Coupling ensemble classifiers with binary classification always yielded the highest accuracies.
Keywords
decision trees; geophysical signal processing; image classification; neural nets; remote sensing; Adaboost; C5.0 tree; Random Forest; artificial neural network; binary classification strategy; decision trees; ensemble classifiers; urban land cover mapping; Artificial neural networks; Bagging; Classification tree analysis; Decision trees; Gain measurement; Remote sensing; Spatial resolution; Support vector machine classification; Support vector machines; Voting; Adaboost; Binary classification; Random Forest; ensemble classification; pairwise classification; urban mapping;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2008. IGARSS 2008. IEEE International
Conference_Location
Boston, MA
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-2807-6
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-2808-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779522
Filename
4779522
Link To Document