DocumentCode
49122
Title
Comments on “A Controllability Counterexample” and the Continuation Lemma
Author
Elliott, David L. ; Lin Tie
Author_Institution
Inst. for Syst. Res., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Volume
60
Issue
4
fYear
2015
fDate
Apr-15
Firstpage
1169
Lastpage
1171
Abstract
A Technical Note in this journal vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 840-841, June 2005, by Elliott, gives a bilinear example showing that the Euler discretization of a noncontrollable continuous-time system can be controllable. The example is correct, but there was a flaw in a result of the TN, Lemma 1 (“for discrete-time systems, local controllability implies controllability”) that has independent interest. In this note, the lemma is reformulated as a conjecture for continuous-in-state systems, and it is also proved under additional conditions. For a class of two-dimensional bilinear systems the Euler discretization is shown directly to be small-controllable, a fortiori controllable.
Keywords
continuous time systems; controllability; discrete time systems; Euler discretization; continuation lemma; continuous-in-state systems; controllability counterexample; discrete-time systems; fortiori controllable; local controllability implies controllability; noncontrollable continuous-time system; two-dimensional bilinear systems; Controllability; Discrete-time systems; Nonlinear systems; Bilinear systems; controllability; discrete-time control systems; small-controllability;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9286
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TAC.2014.2352771
Filename
6887347
Link To Document