• DocumentCode
    49122
  • Title

    Comments on “A Controllability Counterexample” and the Continuation Lemma

  • Author

    Elliott, David L. ; Lin Tie

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. for Syst. Res., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • Volume
    60
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Apr-15
  • Firstpage
    1169
  • Lastpage
    1171
  • Abstract
    A Technical Note in this journal vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 840-841, June 2005, by Elliott, gives a bilinear example showing that the Euler discretization of a noncontrollable continuous-time system can be controllable. The example is correct, but there was a flaw in a result of the TN, Lemma 1 (“for discrete-time systems, local controllability implies controllability”) that has independent interest. In this note, the lemma is reformulated as a conjecture for continuous-in-state systems, and it is also proved under additional conditions. For a class of two-dimensional bilinear systems the Euler discretization is shown directly to be small-controllable, a fortiori controllable.
  • Keywords
    continuous time systems; controllability; discrete time systems; Euler discretization; continuation lemma; continuous-in-state systems; controllability counterexample; discrete-time systems; fortiori controllable; local controllability implies controllability; noncontrollable continuous-time system; two-dimensional bilinear systems; Controllability; Discrete-time systems; Nonlinear systems; Bilinear systems; controllability; discrete-time control systems; small-controllability;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9286
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TAC.2014.2352771
  • Filename
    6887347