DocumentCode
501732
Title
The Consistency of Size Effect: Time Periods, Regression Methods, and Database Selection
Author
Chou, Robin K. ; Huang, Mei Yueh ; Lin, Jun Biao ; Hsu, Jen Tsung
Author_Institution
Dept. of Finance, Nat. Central Univ., Chungli, Taiwan
Volume
1
fYear
2009
fDate
12-14 Aug. 2009
Firstpage
84
Lastpage
88
Abstract
We try to reconcile the findings of prior size effect studies by re-examining the issue with different time periods, regression methods, and database selection. We test whether the size effect varies in relation to the time period, whether extreme observations cause the size effect, by experimenting with different regression methods, and whether the survivorship bias in the COMPUSTAT database induces the size effect. It is found that the size effect is highly significant for data from the earlier time period, but its significance is noticeably reduced for the later time period. Extreme returns cannot fully account for the size effect, because the effect remains strong in the earlier time period even when the extreme observations are trimmed. Finally, we do not find any evidence indicating that the survivorship bias in the COMPUSTAT database is responsible for the size effect.
Keywords
database management systems; regression analysis; COMPUSTAT database; database selection; extreme observations; regression methods; size effect; time periods; Banking; Conference management; Databases; Finance; Financial management; Hybrid intelligent systems; Marketing and sales; Size measurement; Technology management; Testing; CAPM; Least Trimmed Squares Method; Size Effect; Survivorship Bias;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 2009. HIS '09. Ninth International Conference on
Conference_Location
Shenyang
Print_ISBN
978-0-7695-3745-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/HIS.2009.24
Filename
5254339
Link To Document