• DocumentCode
    539227
  • Title

    Union/intersection vs. alternative/conjunction — Defining posterior hypotheses in C2 systems

  • Author

    Krenc, K. ; Kawalec, A.

  • Author_Institution
    RS-SD, R&D Marine Technol. Centre, Gdynia, Poland
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    26-29 July 2010
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    This paper discusses the problem of application of the logical operators while defining the posterior hypotheses, that is hypotheses which are not directly created upon the sensor data. In the authors´ opinion the application of the logical sentence operators is constrained to some specific cases, where the sets operators may be applied as well. On the other hand, the sets operators enable to provide much more adequate posterior hypotheses, which results in higher precision of the fusion final decision. In order to present that an analysis has been made and some examples, related to attribute information fusion in C2 systems have been delivered.
  • Keywords
    command and control systems; sensor fusion; C2 systems; information fusion; logical operators; posterior hypotheses; Cognition; Equations; Fitting; Hafnium; Oceans; Reconnaissance; Target recognition; Classification; DST; DSmT; alternative; conjunction; evidence; intersection; observation; soft-decision fusion; union;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Information Fusion (FUSION), 2010 13th Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Edinburgh
  • Print_ISBN
    978-0-9824438-1-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICIF.2010.5712072
  • Filename
    5712072