DocumentCode
539227
Title
Union/intersection vs. alternative/conjunction — Defining posterior hypotheses in C2 systems
Author
Krenc, K. ; Kawalec, A.
Author_Institution
RS-SD, R&D Marine Technol. Centre, Gdynia, Poland
fYear
2010
fDate
26-29 July 2010
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
This paper discusses the problem of application of the logical operators while defining the posterior hypotheses, that is hypotheses which are not directly created upon the sensor data. In the authors´ opinion the application of the logical sentence operators is constrained to some specific cases, where the sets operators may be applied as well. On the other hand, the sets operators enable to provide much more adequate posterior hypotheses, which results in higher precision of the fusion final decision. In order to present that an analysis has been made and some examples, related to attribute information fusion in C2 systems have been delivered.
Keywords
command and control systems; sensor fusion; C2 systems; information fusion; logical operators; posterior hypotheses; Cognition; Equations; Fitting; Hafnium; Oceans; Reconnaissance; Target recognition; Classification; DST; DSmT; alternative; conjunction; evidence; intersection; observation; soft-decision fusion; union;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Information Fusion (FUSION), 2010 13th Conference on
Conference_Location
Edinburgh
Print_ISBN
978-0-9824438-1-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICIF.2010.5712072
Filename
5712072
Link To Document