DocumentCode
559317
Title
Differences between ASCAT, OSCAT and QuikSCAT derived vorticity: Implications on spatial resolution
Author
Bourassa, Mark A. ; Holbach, Heather
Author_Institution
Dept. of Earth, Ocean, & Atmos. Sci., Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
19-22 Sept. 2011
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
3
Abstract
Scatterometer derived area-averaged vorticity is calculated and compared for the ASCAT, OceanSat-2 (OSCAT) and QuikSCAT scatterometers. All scatterometer capture similar large scale features. There are two key differences; (1) coverage, and (2) small scale features. Differences in noise of the vorticity and rain-flagging (for low quality observations) are identified in images and through spectral analysis. Noise is shown to be an uncomfortably large player when the vorticity is averaged over the two smallest spatial scales. Averaging over a rough circle with a diameter of three grid cells greatly reduces the noise. Consequently, the averaging scale and noise must be considered when combining data from different scatterometers.
Keywords
atmospheric techniques; meteorological instruments; meteorology; remote sensing; spectral analysis; vortices; ASCAT scatterometer; OSCAT scatterometer; OceanSat-2 scatterometer; QuikSCAT scatterometer; large scale features; rain flagging; scatterometer derived area averaged vorticity; spatial resolution; spectral analysis; vortex coverage; vortex small scale features; Noise; Oceans; Probability density function; Probability distribution; Radar measurements; Smoothing methods; Vectors; Scatterometry; noise; resolution; vorticity;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
OCEANS 2011
Conference_Location
Waikoloa, HI
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-1427-6
Type
conf
Filename
6107124
Link To Document