• DocumentCode
    56582
  • Title

    It´s all positive [State of the Art]

  • Author

    Johnson, Arthur T.

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • Volume
    4
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Jan. 2013
  • Firstpage
    40
  • Lastpage
    40
  • Abstract
    It is easy to publish positive results, but difficult to publish negative results. Not all failures can be useful, but sometimes negative information can be positive. Those of us who conduct research and publish the results know that our experiments hardly ever work the first time. There are protocol adjustments to make, temperatures to control, additional measurements to make, timing issues, calibration problems, and a host of other reasons why failures occur. Biological experiments are often much more sensitive to specific conditions than are other kinds. Enzymes require optimal conditions to be effective, biochemicals degrade with time, target cells adapt to new environments, and temperature fluctuations may have profound effects. There are so many reasons why an experiment may not have the expected results that extreme care is usually required to be successful.
  • Keywords
    biomedical engineering; enzymes; respiratory protection; biological experiments; calibration problems; enzymes; experiment negative result; negative information; protocol adjustments; respiratory protective masks; temperature fluctuations; timing issues; Failure analysis; Professional communication; Publishing; Research and development;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Pulse, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    2154-2287
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MPUL.2012.2228586
  • Filename
    6461580