DocumentCode
780585
Title
MSK-Type Reception of Continuous Phase Modulation: Cochannel and Adjacent Channel Interference
Author
Rhodes, Russell B., Jr. ; Wilson, Stephen G. ; Svensson, Arne B.
Author_Institution
M/A-COM Gov. Systems, Vienna, VA, USA
Volume
35
Issue
2
fYear
1987
fDate
2/1/1987 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
185
Lastpage
193
Abstract
For binary continuous-phase modulation with modulation index
(MSK being a rather familiar example), quadrature matched-filter reception is possible with only minor degradation relative to the maximum likelihood (trellis-based) receiver. Thus this class of modulations provides good spectral attributes together with reception techniques capable of being implemented simply at high speeds. As usual, the constant-envelope property is also present. We study here the effects of interfering signals with the same modulation format, located at the same frequency (cochannel interference), or at a nearby frequency (adjacent channel interference). Coherent reception is assumed, and we analyze two channel situations: both signals nonfading with additive Gaussian noise; and both signals independently Rayleigh fading, with additive Gaussian noise. As one would expect, the smoothed phase modulation schemes have larger tolerable adjacent channel levels, while there is little differentiation in the cochannel case. We also find that MSK filters are usable for other formats with negligible loss in performance relative to the optimal linear filters, provided the filter parameters are rescaled appropriately.
(MSK being a rather familiar example), quadrature matched-filter reception is possible with only minor degradation relative to the maximum likelihood (trellis-based) receiver. Thus this class of modulations provides good spectral attributes together with reception techniques capable of being implemented simply at high speeds. As usual, the constant-envelope property is also present. We study here the effects of interfering signals with the same modulation format, located at the same frequency (cochannel interference), or at a nearby frequency (adjacent channel interference). Coherent reception is assumed, and we analyze two channel situations: both signals nonfading with additive Gaussian noise; and both signals independently Rayleigh fading, with additive Gaussian noise. As one would expect, the smoothed phase modulation schemes have larger tolerable adjacent channel levels, while there is little differentiation in the cochannel case. We also find that MSK filters are usable for other formats with negligible loss in performance relative to the optimal linear filters, provided the filter parameters are rescaled appropriately.Keywords
Cochannel interference; Continuous phase modulation; Inter-channel interference; Additive noise; Continuous phase modulation; Degradation; Frequency; Gaussian noise; Interchannel interference; Nonlinear filters; Phase modulation; Rayleigh channels; Signal analysis;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Communications, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0090-6778
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TCOM.1987.1096741
Filename
1096741
Link To Document