• DocumentCode
    82995
  • Title

    3D Microendoscopic Electrical Impedance Tomography for Margin Assessment During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

  • Author

    Mahara, Aditya ; Khan, Shadab ; Murphy, Ethan K. ; Schned, Alan R. ; Hyams, Elias S. ; Halter, Ryan J.

  • Author_Institution
    Thayer Sch. of Eng., Dartmouth Coll., Hanover, NH, USA
  • Volume
    34
  • Issue
    7
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Jul-15
  • Firstpage
    1590
  • Lastpage
    1601
  • Abstract
    Radially configured microendoscopic electrical impedance probes intended for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were examined through simulation, bench-top experimentation, and ex vivo tissue studies. Three probe designs with 8, 9, and 17 electrodes, respectively, were analyzed through finite element method based simulations. One mm diameter spherical inclusions ( σinclusion = 1 S/m) are positioned at various locations within a hemispherical background ( σbackground = 0.1 S/m) of radius 5 mm. An 8-electrode configuration is not able to localize the inclusion at these positions while 9 and 17-electrode configurations are able to accurately reconstruct the inclusion at maximum depth of 1 mm and 3 mm, respectively. All three probe designs were constructed and evaluated using saline phantoms and ex vivo porcine and human prostate tissues. The 17-electrode probe performed best in saline phantom studies, accurately reconstructing high contrast, 1-mm-diameter metal cylindrical inclusions in a saline bath ( σsaline = 0.1 S/m) with a position and area error of 0.46 mm and 0.84 mm2, respectively. Additionally, the 17-electrode probe was able to adequately distinguish cancerous from benign tissues in three ex vivo human prostates. Simulations, bench-top saline experiments, and ex vivo tissue sampling suggest that for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during RALP, the 17-electrode probe (as compared to an 8 and 9 electrode probe) will be necessary to provide sufficient accuracy and sensitivity.
  • Keywords
    biomedical electrodes; cancer; electric impedance imaging; endoscopes; image sampling; medical image processing; medical robotics; phantoms; surgery; tumours; 17-electrode configuration; 3D microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography; 8-electrode configuration; 9-electrode configuration; RALP; bench-top experimentation; benign tissues; cancerous tissues; depth 1 mm; depth 3 mm; ex vivo porcine; ex vivo tissue sampling; finite element method based simulations; hemispherical background; human prostate tissues; human prostates; intraoperative surgical margin assessment; metal cylindrical inclusions; probe designs; radially configured microendoscopic electrical impedance probes; radius 5 mm; robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; saline bath; saline phantoms; size 1 mm; spherical inclusions; Cancer; Conductivity; Electrodes; Image reconstruction; Impedance; Probes; Tomography; Electrical impedance tomography; microendoscopic probe; prostate cancer; surgical margin assessment;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2015.2407833
  • Filename
    7051285