• DocumentCode
    86091
  • Title

    Comparison of Inductive and Resistive SFCL

  • Author

    Kozak, Janusz ; Majka, Michal ; Kozak, Slawomir ; Janowski, Tadeusz

  • Author_Institution
    Electrotech. Inst., Warsaw, Poland
  • Volume
    23
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Jun-13
  • Firstpage
    5600604
  • Lastpage
    5600604
  • Abstract
    This article presents a comparison of inductive and resistive superconducting fault current limiter built with the same length of high temperature superconducting (HTS) tape. The resistive limiter is constructed as a noninductive bifilar winding. The inductive coreless limiter consists of primary winding and secondary shorted winding. Both limiters are connected parallel to the additional Cu primary winding, which helps to reduce the power dissipated in the HTS windings during and after a fault. It also ensures that in cases of an HTS tape failure, the protected circuit will not be disrupted. The limiters are very fast and the first peak is almost equally limited by both types of limiters.
  • Keywords
    copper; high-temperature superconductors; superconducting fault current limiters; superconducting tapes; windings; HTS tape failure; high temperature superconducting tape; inductive SFCL; inductive coreless limiter; inductive superconducting fault current limiter; noninductive bifilar winding; power dissipation; primary winding; protected circuit; resistive SFCL; resistive superconducting fault current limiter; secondary shorted winding; Circuit faults; Copper; High temperature superconductors; Resistance; Superconducting films; Temperature measurement; Windings; Bifilar coil; superconducting inductive fault current limiter (SFCL); superconducting tape;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1051-8223
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TASC.2012.2231714
  • Filename
    6375768