• DocumentCode
    863523
  • Title

    Plant adaptive systems versus ordinary feedback systems

  • Author

    Horowitz, I.M.

  • Author_Institution
    Hughes Research Laboratories, Malibu, CA, USA
  • Volume
    7
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1962
  • fDate
    1/1/1962 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    48
  • Lastpage
    56
  • Abstract
    The limitations in classical feedback that might justify the more complex plant or process adaptive systems are studied. Some of the limitations cited in the adaptive literature apply only to the classical single-degree-of-freedom configuration and not to the classical two-degree-of-freedom structures. Model and conditional feedback configurations are not superior to ordinary two-degree-of-freedom configurations. Time invariant (classical) compensation is adequate for coping with the sensitivity and disturbance problem in lightly damped and drifting plant poles. Two significant limitations in ordinary linear feedback systems that may justify the adaptive approach are: a) Their susceptibility to feedback transducer noise when the plant by itself does not have the loop gain area required for the desired sensitivity properties of the system; b) The limited sensitivity reduction achievable in nonminimum phase and unstable plants. The first of these may be eased by a multiple-loop design and the second by a parallel plant design. However, it has not been shown how the adaptive systems overcome the limitations of ordinary feedback systems.
  • Keywords
    Adaptive systems; Feedback loop; Noise reduction; Phase noise; Terrorism; Transducers; Transfer functions;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Automatic Control, IRE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0096-199X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TAC.1962.1105403
  • Filename
    1105403