• DocumentCode
    892632
  • Title

    Reconciliation of methods of compensation for PSSs in multimachine systems

  • Author

    Gibbard, Michael J. ; Vowles, David J.

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Univ. of Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • Volume
    19
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2004
  • Firstpage
    463
  • Lastpage
    472
  • Abstract
    Several methods for the design of compensation for power system stabilizers (PSSs) are used in practice. The object of this paper is to reconcile the methods and explore their relative advantages and disadvantages. Three methods are investigated: the GEP and the P-Vr frequency response approaches, and the method of residues. It is shown the phase response of a modified GEP transfer function (TF) agrees closely with that of the P-Vr TF, thus providing the basis for the design of a robust PSS. Residues yield only a limited number of phase angles that can be used with confidence for design purposes and are consistent with the P-Vr phase response. The remaining residues for rotor modes are affected by variability of participation factor angles and interactions from other machines. Unlike other methods, the P-Vr approach yields magnitude and phase information that simplifies the synthesis of the PSS TF and yields a robust stabilizer.
  • Keywords
    compensation; electric machines; frequency response; power system dynamic stability; rotors; transfer function matrices; P-Vr frequency response; P-Vr phase response; compensation design; multimachine systems; power system dynamic stability; power system stabilizers; transfer function; Damping; Frequency response; Power system dynamics; Power system stability; Robustness; Shafts; Torque; Transfer functions; Tuning; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-8950
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820689
  • Filename
    1266601