DocumentCode
893296
Title
A comparative evaluation of four basic system-level diagnosis strategies for hypercubes
Author
Kavianpour, A. ; Kim, K.H.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., California Univ., Irvine, CA, USA
Volume
41
Issue
1
fYear
1992
fDate
3/1/1992 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
26
Lastpage
37
Abstract
The approach of mutual-testing-based system diagnosis is considered for its cost effectiveness in diagnosing n -cubes ( n -dimensional hypercube multi-computer systems). Processors test each other and the test results are collected and analyzed to determine faulty processors. Four basic diagnosis strategies based on this approach are considered for n -cubes: one-t , one- t ´/t ´, seq-t , and seq-t ´/t ´. One-t and one-t ´/t ´ are one-step strategies which involve only one test phase and one repair phase. The goal is to identify and replace all faulty-processors through one mutual test phase. The other two are sequential strategies which involve multiple iterative test and repair phases
Keywords
computer testing; hypercube networks; parallel architectures; faulty-processors; hypercubes; mutual-testing-based system diagnosis; n-cubes; n-dimensional hypercube multi-computer systems; one-step strategies; repair phase; sequential strategies; test phase; Application software; Concurrent computing; Costs; Fault diagnosis; Graph theory; Hypercubes; Sequential analysis; Sequential diagnosis; System testing; Upper bound;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9529
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/24.126666
Filename
126666
Link To Document