• DocumentCode
    935052
  • Title

    A comparison of function point counting techniques

  • Author

    Jeffery, D.R. ; Low, G.C. ; Barnes, M.

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Inf. Syst., New Sotuh Wales Univ., Kensington, NSW, Australia
  • Volume
    19
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    1993
  • fDate
    5/1/1993 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    529
  • Lastpage
    532
  • Abstract
    Effective management of the software development process requires that management be able to estimate total development effort and cost. One of the fundamental problems associated with effort and cost estimation is the a priori estimation of software size. Function point analysis has emerged over the last decade as a popular tool for this task. Criticisms of the method that relate to the way in which function counts are calculated and the impact of the processing complexity adjustment on the function point count have arisen. SPQR/20 function points among others are claimed to overcome some of these criticisms. The SPQR/20 function point method is compared to traditional function point analysis as a measure of software size in an empirical study of MIS environments. In a study of 64 projects in one organization it was found that both methods would appear equally satisfactory. However consistent use of one method should occur since the individual counts differ considerably
  • Keywords
    DP management; project management; software engineering; SPQR/20 function points; a priori estimation; function point counting techniques; processing complexity adjustment; software development process; software size; Application software; Appropriate technology; Costs; Information systems; Performance analysis; Productivity; Programming; Size measurement; Software development management; Software measurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0098-5589
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/32.232016
  • Filename
    232016