DocumentCode
969663
Title
Federal Appeals Court Sees Potential Antitrust Violation in Standardization Skullduggery
Author
Stern, Richard
Volume
27
Issue
5
fYear
2007
Firstpage
109
Lastpage
110
Abstract
The US court of appeals in Philadelphia recently ruled that intentional deception of a private standard-setting organization, when used to acquire or maintain monopoly power, can be an illegal monopolistic practice. The ruling reversed a trial court decision that had dismissed Broadcom´s lawsuit against Qualcomm involving the latter´s patented technology in the UMTS standard for cell phones. Stern explains the ruling and notes its implications for IEEE standard-setting bodies.
Keywords
3G mobile communication; GSM; Licenses; Manufacturing; Monopoly; Multiaccess communication; Standardization; Standards organizations; Telecommunication standards; Wideband; RAND; antitrust policy; law; licensing; patents; standardization;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Micro, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0272-1732
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MM.2007.4378788
Filename
4378788
Link To Document