• DocumentCode
    969663
  • Title

    Federal Appeals Court Sees Potential Antitrust Violation in Standardization Skullduggery

  • Author

    Stern, Richard

  • Volume
    27
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2007
  • Firstpage
    109
  • Lastpage
    110
  • Abstract
    The US court of appeals in Philadelphia recently ruled that intentional deception of a private standard-setting organization, when used to acquire or maintain monopoly power, can be an illegal monopolistic practice. The ruling reversed a trial court decision that had dismissed Broadcom´s lawsuit against Qualcomm involving the latter´s patented technology in the UMTS standard for cell phones. Stern explains the ruling and notes its implications for IEEE standard-setting bodies.
  • Keywords
    3G mobile communication; GSM; Licenses; Manufacturing; Monopoly; Multiaccess communication; Standardization; Standards organizations; Telecommunication standards; Wideband; RAND; antitrust policy; law; licensing; patents; standardization;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Micro, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0272-1732
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MM.2007.4378788
  • Filename
    4378788