• DocumentCode
    998445
  • Title

    A comparison of vertical and longitudinal magnetic recording based on analytic models

  • Author

    Bromley, David J.

  • Author_Institution
    Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA
  • Volume
    19
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    1983
  • fDate
    9/1/1983 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    2239
  • Lastpage
    2244
  • Abstract
    Simple, approximately self-consistent models of magnetic recording as well as materials limitations are used to show that, ultimately, vertical recording will have no fundamental advantage in signal strength, bit shift, or resolution over conventional longitudinal recording. While very narrow transitions are in principle stable when \\over\\rightarrow{M} is vertical, this analysis predicts written transitions that are much broader than the demagnetizing limit, just as in longitudinal recording. The limiting factor is shown to be the gradient of the writing head\´s field.
  • Keywords
    Magnetic recording/recording materials; Coercive force; Demagnetization; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic heads; Magnetic materials; Magnetic recording; Magnetization; Perpendicular magnetic recording; Signal analysis; Writing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.1983.1062767
  • Filename
    1062767