DocumentCode
998445
Title
A comparison of vertical and longitudinal magnetic recording based on analytic models
Author
Bromley, David J.
Author_Institution
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA
Volume
19
Issue
5
fYear
1983
fDate
9/1/1983 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
2239
Lastpage
2244
Abstract
Simple, approximately self-consistent models of magnetic recording as well as materials limitations are used to show that, ultimately, vertical recording will have no fundamental advantage in signal strength, bit shift, or resolution over conventional longitudinal recording. While very narrow transitions are in principle stable when
is vertical, this analysis predicts written transitions that are much broader than the demagnetizing limit, just as in longitudinal recording. The limiting factor is shown to be the gradient of the writing head\´s field.
is vertical, this analysis predicts written transitions that are much broader than the demagnetizing limit, just as in longitudinal recording. The limiting factor is shown to be the gradient of the writing head\´s field.Keywords
Magnetic recording/recording materials; Coercive force; Demagnetization; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic heads; Magnetic materials; Magnetic recording; Magnetization; Perpendicular magnetic recording; Signal analysis; Writing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9464
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMAG.1983.1062767
Filename
1062767
Link To Document