چكيده فارسي :
موضوع پژوهش، پردازش تاريخ‌گرايي در معماري معاصر ايران است. نشانه‌هاي تاريخي در معماري، بارزترين مشخصۀ تاريخ‌گرايي در حوزۀ معاصر است. سؤال پژوهش «چگونگي نمود تاريخ همچنين نشانه‌هاي تاريخ‌گرايي در دوره بنديهاي تأليفات معماري معاصر؟» و فرضيه «عينيت يافتن نشانه‌هاي تاريخي همچنين امكان دوره بندي آثار معاصر بر اساس شاخصه‌هاي تاريخ‌گرايي» هستند. پژوهش پس از پردازش مفاهيم تاريخ‌گرايي و جايگاهش در تأليفات، الگويي براي بررسي آثار ارائه مي‌دهد. پژوهش كيفي است با راهبرد تفسيري كه با روش تاريخي- انتقادي پس‌زمينۀ تاريخِ معماري را بازنمائي و با استفاده از فرايند تاريخ‌گرايي هِگِل كه از روش‌هاي تحقيق تاريخي است، دوره بنديهاي معاصر را ارزيابي كرده و پس از استنتاج مدلي 3 گانه براي تاريخ‌گرايي، در راستاي پاسخ به سؤالات تحقيق برمي‌آيد. نتيجه اينكه، مجموعاً شش نوع دوره بندي در تأليفات دهۀ 80 هجري شمسي قابل استخراج است. پنج اثر تأليفي تاريخ‌گرايي سمبوليك و تنها يك اثر تاريخ‌گرايي فلسفي دارند.
چكيده لاتين :
The subject of this research is the processing of historicism in the contemporary Iranian architectural works.
Historical signs in architecture are the most prominent features of historicism in the contemporary context. This
research begins with the question “How historicism is presented in contemporary architectural works?". It is
assumed that history in contemporary architecture has presented itself with objective and subjective elements and
has been crystallized in different ways. Also, the contemporary Iranian architectural works with a rich history of
ancient architecture, are not exception for the acceptance of history in the contemporary world. Moreover, assuming
that historicist practices allow the historical classification of the contemporary Iranian architectural compilations,
these compilations must inevitably be placed in the identification model of the type of historicism.
After processing the concept of historicism and periodization, the research provides a model for studying the
works. Based on the views of Hegel and other architectural theorists such as Alan Colquhoun, this model classifies
historicism into three types )Classical historicism, Symbolic historicism, and Philosophical(. Colquhoun believes:
historicism can be used for three things: The first one is an approach; the second is an artistic practice and the third
is a theory of history. Attention to history leads to the emergence of historicism as a perceptible and analyzing
process. A concept that, in a particularly, influential way in Hegel's philosophy, was found to be its clear and
influential scheme and continued with various narratives in the next philosophical schools.
Moreover, examining the periodization method of each work in the 2000s, this research conducts a thematic
categorization and proceeds through the Hegelian historicism process, which is a method of doing historical
research. “Periodization” is the separation of works and events in the form of occasional categories and styles. “Periodization” is a historical view and an attempt to express the “Zeitgeist”, Also is one of the main tools of
historical studies. But using this tool has its own difficulties. Historical periodization, for historians, is a frequent
controversy that implies the necessity of an agreement and often appears as a historic event. Analysis of the
common periods and types of historicism is another aspect of this research for answering the research questions.
This research is of qualitative type with an interpretive strategy that reflects the historical context of the architecture
of Iran through a historical-critical approach. The selected case studies include contemporary Iranian architectural
compilation works of the 2000s, which include a total of eight books attempting to determine the periodicity of the
contemporary Iranian architectural works in various ways.
The results of this paper show that historicism evaluated in the architectural works in the 2000s can be classified into
six categories. In the study of various types of historicism, it was also found that there have been no compilations of classical historicism. In five works, symbolic historicism, and only in one book, philosophical historicism has been
the criterion for determining the periodicity of the contemporary architectural works. There have been no signs of
historicism in three works.
