مباني فقهي-كلامي رهبري امام‌خميني(ره) در انقلاب اسلامي با نگاهي به مقاصدالشريعه

Jurisprudential-Theological Principles of Imam Khomeini's Leadership in the Islamic Revolution (Case Study: Maghased al Sharia)

هدف از اين مقاله بررسي مباني فقهي-كلامي امام‌خميني(ره) در رهبري انقلاب اسلامي به لحاظ شيوۀ مديريت، اهداف و اغراض متصل به اهداف شارع مقدس مي‌باشد. پرسش اصلي مقاله اين است كه امام خميني كدامين مباني فقهي-كلامي را در رهبري انقلاب به خدمت گرفتند كه اين گونه موجب پذيرش عام رهبري ايشان شد. عمده‌ترين يافته‌هاي تحقيق عبارت‌اند از پيوند مقاصدالشريعه و روح ديانت با اهداف انقلاب اسلامي، ارتباط مصلحت و ولايت و نقش آن در پيروزي انقلاب اسلامي، تطبيق رهبري سياسي و فقهي امام‌خميني در پيروزي انقلاب اسلامي و پيوند عناصر مبارزه با سلطه‌گري و ظلم ستيزي، و عدالت‌خواهي با مباني نظري و عملي رهبري امام‌خميني با رويكرد مقاصدالشريعه، و همچنين پيوند منسجم ميان ديدگاه‌هاي امام در حقوق خصوصي و حقوق عمومي كه هر دو مبتني بر چارچوب‌هاي فقهي-كلامي يكساني بوده‌اند. روش جمع‌آوري داده‌ها كتابخانه‌اي و روش مقاله توصيفي-تحليلي است.

The purpose of this article is to study the jurisprudential-theological principles of Imam Khomeini in the leadership of the Islamic Revolution in terms of management, goals and objectives related to the goals of the Holy Shari'a. The main question of the article is this which jurisprudential-theological principles did Imam Khomeini use in the leadership of the revolution that led to the general acceptance of his leadership. The results are the connection between the intentions of Sharia and the spirit of religion with the goals of the Islamic Revolution, the relationship between expediency and province and its role in the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Implementing Imam Khomeini's political and jurisprudential leadership in the victory of the Islamic Revolution and linking the elements of struggle against domination and oppression, and seeking justice with the theoretical and practical foundations of Imam Khomeini's leadership with the approach of Sharia goals, as well as a coherent link between Imam Khomeini's views on private law and public law. They have been the same on jurisprudential-theological frameworks. The data collection method was documentary and the article approach was descriptive-analytical.