كليدواژه :
فارس , كريمخان زند , لارستان , محمّد نصير خان لاري
چكيده فارسي :
با نگاهي به تاريخ ايران چنين استنباط ميشود كه شالوده حاكميّت در اين سرزمين بر دو ركن اعتقاد و عرف قرار داشته است. صفويان بر اساس اعتقاد مردم به خاندان ايشان به حكومت رسيدند و حدود دويست و پنجاه سال حكومت كردند. اما سقوط صفويان نه‌تنها به حاكميّت آنان پايان داد بلكه قداست آن خاندان را بطور قابل ملاحظه اي بيرنگ كرد. از اينرو، از آن به بعد اساس حاكميّت بر عرف قرار گرفت كه شامل قدرت و اصالت خاندان ميشد. نادر، بر مبناي قدرت و اقبال مردم به حكومت رسيد و هرگونه مخالفتي را با كشتار مخالفين و تبعيد ايلات سركوب كرد. اما حكومت نادر زمينه اغواكننده اي را براي جاه طلبي و زيادت خواهي ساير روساي ايلات بوجود آورد. قتل نادر اين فرصت را براي سران ايلات جهت پيگيري اهداف ديرينه شان فراهم كرد. ظهور رقباي متعدّد براي دستيابي بسرير قدرت، موجب جنگها، قتل عام، غارت، و آوارگي مردم ايران گرديد. پيروزي كريمخان بر رقبايش براي حكمرانان مناطق و روساي ايلات چندان خوشايند نبود و با وجود حكومت شاهرخ در خراسان، بسختي حاكميّت كريمخان را پذيرا بودند. حكام و روساي ايلات فارس بخصوص لار، اقتدار كريمخان را در فارس تهديدي جدّي براي حاكميّت منطقه اي خويش تلقّي ميكردند. توسعه طلبي حكام لارستان در هنگام حكومت حاجيخان كالي، برادر نصيرخان، به حدّي رسيد كه در صدد تصرّف شيراز برآمد. چون حكومت لارستان و سبعه به محمّد نصير خان رسيد، وي تا حدّ ممكن حاكميّت كريمخان را نپذيرفت. اين امر موجب تنش و برخورد هايي خونين بين شيراز و لار شد.
چكيده لاتين :
Having a look at the history of Iran, one can realize that, the foundation of governorship in this country was based on two factors, religious belief and tradition, as the Safavids came to power according to the former category and ruled for more than two centuries. The fall of the Safavid dynasty not only ended their ruling, but decreased their holiness drastically. Therefore, from then on the basis of ruling depended more on power and family nobility of ruling classes. The accession of Nadir to the throne of Iran was based on the approach of Iranian people and his power. He suppressed any opposition movements and banished rebellious tribes; nevertheless, created a persuasive ground for other tribal chiefs’ ambition and loving power. The killing of Nadir, offered a desirable opportunity for the tribal chiefs in pursuing their long-standing aspirations. The appearance of many rivals in the scene of political power in order to grab the throne of Iran, produced wars, massacres, looting and homelessness in most part of the country. Considering Shahrukh’s Kingship in Khurasan, Karim Khan’s victories over his rivals, were not pleasant for many of the tribal chiefs. It was very hard to except a low ranking family such as Karim Khan in power. The local governors and tribal chiefs of Far, especially in Larestan, the power of Karim Khan was considered as a serious threat to them in that region.
The local ruler in Larestan, like the other region in Iran, was hereditary. On the other hand, the economic foundation of Larestan was completely depended on trade. The local rulers always endeavoured to extend their influence from Shiraz, in north to the shores of the Persian Gulf, in south which could be estimated about 624 km in length. When Nasir Khan took power in Larsetan and Sab’ah, tried hard to deny the authority of Karim Khan so far as possible. This policy produced tensions and conflicts between Shiraz and Lar. Therefore, Naiser Khan decided to support the rivals of Karim Khan, Azad Khan and Muhammad Hassan Khan Qajar. He Would have been appointed as governor of Fars if Karim Khan could be defeated.
The purpose of this paper is to study and analyze the relations between Nasir Khan and Karim Khan Zand, according to reliable sources.
