مقايسه تطبيقي هرمنوتيك غزالي - ابن عربي

Comparative comparison of Ibn Arabi and Ghazaliʹʹs Hermeneutics

متون مقدس مهم ترين منبع براي شناخت احكام و معارف اسلامي به شمار مي آيند؛ اما درباره چگونگي فهم اين متون ميان صاحب نظران اختلاف عقيده وجود دارد و هر گروهي از ديدگاه خاص خود به آنها نگريسته اند. چنانكه تاويل عارفانه به جنبه هاي باطني و معنوي متون قدسي و كشف اسرار و اشارات آن مي پردازد. به اين معنا كه عرفا با ديدگاهي متفاوت از سايرين، شيوه صحيح فهم متون را از طريق باطن، امر ممكن دانسته و در صدد فهم متون از راه تاويل برآمده اند. پژوهش حاضر به بررسي و تطبيق سبك احمد غزالي و ابن عربي بر اساس قواعد و ضوابط تاويل مي پردازد. اين فيلسوفان در كانوني ترين نقطه بحث خود به موضوع "فهم"با تاكيد "فهم متن" مي پردازند و مباحث مطرح شده از سوي آنان، واجد استعداد بسياري است كه مي تواند در ساز و كار و روش نوانديشان مسلمان موثر افتد. در اين خصوص آيا مي توان گفت ميان آراي تاويلي احمد غزالي و ابن عربي اشتراك يا تفاوتي وجود دارد؟ برآيند تحقيق در پاره اي از موارد، نشان از وحدت سبك تاويل غزالي و ابن عربي و حتي هرمنوتيك جديد دارد. در برخي موارد در ديـدگاه احمد غزالي شيوه هايي وجود دارد كه منحصر به خود اوست.

The Scared Texts are the most valuable source for recognizing Islamic rules and knowledge; however, there is disagreement over the way these texts are understood in between Scholars where each group has looked at them from their own special standing point as the mystical interpretation deals with esoteric and spiritual aspects of the Divine Texts and discovery of secrets and references. This means that mystics, with perspectives different from others have come to realize the proper understanding of the texts through the inward and have sought to realize through interpretation. The present research deals with investigation and comparison of the Ahmad Ghazali and Ibn Arabiʹs styles based on rules and criteria of interpretation. These philosophers deal with the issue of "understanding" with emphasis on "understanding texts" within their most focal point of their discussions. The issues raised by them involve huge qualification that could fall effective in the mechanisms and ways of the Muslims neo-thinkers. In this respect, can we state that there is a difference or a similarity between the views of Ghazali and those of Ibn Arabi? Consequence of the research in some points implies a unity of interpretational style between Ghazali and Ibn Arabi and some sort of hermeneutic modality. In some cases, there are ways in which the Ahmad Ghazaliʹs perspectives are unique of him. Mirzaye Qomi as one of the great "Osuliyun" based on the same basis of canonists were not optimistic about philosophy and tightly take the cavil to them. He has deal with practical mysticism amd associated withfamous mystics of his time; and he counts "spirituality" and "pure monotheism" the culmination of the evolution of mystical and summary and deep extracts and wondrous and wonder of pure Islam.